Grete Pasch
Carmen Valdés R.
University of Texas at Austin, USA.
GSLIS, SZB 564. University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Tel: +1 (512) 741 3821 Fax: +1 (512) 794 3872
gpasch@gslis.utexas.edu
Independent Researcher, Guatemala.
carmina@nortropic.com
Abstract
Until 1995, there were no Internet nodes in Guatemala, and few
institutions enjoyed access to email and remote database access.
The first Internet connections became active in late 1995. A surge
in the number of commercial and academic users followed. The
Internet was embraced with the enthusiasm transmitted by early
adopters and reflected in the media. GUATEL, the Guatemalan
telecommunications company, cooperated with the establishment of
the academic network, but in many ways its tight control over the
telecommunications infrastructure delayed the introduction of
Internet services. Changes are occurring during 1996, as President
Alvaro Arzú's government prepares to end GUATEL's monopoly.
Keywords
Internet, Guatemala, GUATEL, telecommunications, monopoly, Mayanet,
Mayapaq, Racsapac, huracan.cr, nicarao, uvg.gt, UCRVM2, Telepuerto
de Guatemala, CONCYT, World Wide Web, Cybernet, Chapines Online.
Contents:
The access to international and local computer networks depends on
the policies instituted by the governmental telecommunications
company GUATEL, Empresa Guatemalteca de
Telecomunicaciones. Since 1971 GUATEL holds, by law, the
exclusive right to manage all public communications services,
including those that did not even exist at the time the law was
written (Ibargüen, 1992.)
GUATEL has not met the growing demand for basic services. By
mid-1996, there were only about 400,000 phone lines serving a
population of over 10 million, or 4 lines per 100 inhabitants. The
ratio was much lower outside of the urban areas: 80% of all phone
lines were installed in Guatemala City (population: 2 million), 19%
in other cities, and only 1% in the rural areas. According to
GUATEL's management, over 300,000 applications for new lines were
on their waiting lists. Total unsatisfied demand was calculated to
be between 600,000 and 1.2 million lines, and 95,000 new lines that
had been paid for by users had not been connected (Chang, 1994;
"Telecomunicaciones", 1996; Urízar, 1996). Users wait up to
10 years and pay between US$1,000 and US$1,500 for a phone
line.
Data transmission services are not well developed either.
Leased lines are expensive and scarce. A public competition to
install a countrywide data network was announced in 1987. Two
years later, Sprint/Telenet was awarded the contract. By January of
1992, 90% of the network had been installed: five main nodes in
Guatemala City and one in the city of Quetzaltenango with 64 Kbps
links, plus 35 points of access throughout the country. This X.25
packet switching network was named Mayapaq: Maya for
the Mayan culture that thrived in Guatemala over a thousand years
ago, paq for the Spanish word paquete,
packet.
Mayapaq was connected to Costa Rica's Racsapac (RACSA,
Radiográfica Costarricense, S.A.) through the regional X.75
microwave network coordinated by COMTELCA, the Central American
Telecommunications Committee. RACSA also offered points of access
for the data networks in other Central American countries: Mayapaq
in Guatemala, Antelpac in El Salvador, Hondutel/Teledatos in
Honduras, Nicapac in Nicaragua, and Racsapac in Costa Rica and
Panama. This constituted the only regional data network. Mayapaq
also had an X.75 link to Accunet (AT&T) at 9.6 Kbps, one to TRT
at 4.8 Kbps, and one to SprintNet at 64 Kbps (Contreras, 1992.)
Awarding the contract and building Mayapaq took over 5 years. The
commercialization of the service was slow: rates were only
tentatively set, potential users were not informed, and usage was
slow in picking up. There have been technical problems, notably
the slow speed of many dial-in connections: 2,400 bps is typical,
9,600 bps the maximum. Users outside of Guatemala City complain of
PADs that never answer, forcing them to spend on long distance
calls into the more reliable stations in Guatemala City. Studies
on Mayapaq's effectiveness are not publicly available to the
authors' knowledge.
All international data and voice traffic outside of Central
America flows via satellite. Guatemala, through GUATEL, is a
signatory to INTELSAT, holding the minimum .05% of all shares.
This has been seen as one of the reasons why GUATEL has held so
tightly to its monopoly in the provision of satellite services
(Jacobs, 1993.)
During Vinicio Cerezo's presidency, the company Telepuerto
de Guatemala applied for and won a concession to operate a
data transmission facility via satellite. Telepuerto is part of
Grupo Zeta, a business group that manages similar facilities in
other Central American countries. Available services include 64
Kbps channels through Telepuerto's terrestrial station (one type F-
1 10 meter satellite dish for Intelsat, a 4.5 meter satellite dish
for PanAmSat) or via individual VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal)
stations (Pasch, 1994a.) By the time Telepuerto was ready to
operate (July, 1992) GUATEL decided to revoke their permit.
Telepuerto went to court, suing the manager of GUATEL, Ernesto
González Méndez, and demanding their right to
operate, but lost ("CC declaró...", 1993.) Further
negotiations with GUATEL have been difficult. Telepuerto should be
able to begin official operations in the first quarter of 1997, if
GUATEL's monopoly ends as announced.
Since late 1992, after revoking Telepuerto's permit, GUATEL
started offering IBS, an International Business Service. In mid-
1995, the cost of a 64 Kbps line, usually subdivided into a data
channel (19.2) and four voice lines, was about US$8,000 per month.
This included the downlink in the United States. A 128 Kbps
channel cost about US$12,000 per month. The service was strictly
point to point, and not resaleable. Services could be bought
through AT&T and MCI ("Long Term...", 1993.) At least 16
organizations were IBS users by mid-1995, including the Canadian
Embassy, Avon, Citibank, 3M, Ginsa, Pacific Bank, Proctor &
Gamble, Visa International, GBM (IBM), and others. Most users had
downlinks into the United States (Duke, 1995).
2 ENDING GUATEL'S MONOPOLY
There have been several attempts to end GUATEL's monopoly. In the
late 1980s, the government of President Vinicio Cerezo allowed
private companies to bid and win concessions to add 300,000 new
phone lines, and to provide cellular and satellite services.
However, most of these contracts were reviewed and canceled after
the new President, Jorge Serrano Elías, came to power.
In 1993, after the abrupt end of Serrano Elías' mandate,
Ramiro De León Carpio took over and announced that by the
end of his mandate in early 1996, both GUATEL and Fegua,
Ferrocarriles de Guatemala, the national railroad
company, would have been privatized (Hurtarte, 1993.) Dr. Manuel
Ayau was appointed coordinator of the "Governmental Privatization
Committee." Dr. Ayau's related experience dates as far back as
1963, when he advised then President Miguel Ydígoras Fuentes
to privatize the national phone company, "Empresa Nacional de
Teléfonos" (Ayau, 1995a.) As a successful businessman, a
vocal free-market proponent, and the founder of the UFM,
Universidad Francisco Marroquín, Dr. Ayau
represented the stance of the Guatemalan business community. He
saw the need for 2 million new phone lines as well as for new
services, such as cellular telephony and satellite links. However,
he argued that GUATEL would never be able to make the necessary US$
2 billion investment. Thus, in 1994 Dr. Ayau proposed selling
GUATEL: 33% of all shares would be auctioned off to prequalified
investors; 60% of shares would be freely distributed to all
registered voters and to members of the military forces, and 5%
would be given to GUATEL's workers, who could also opt to buy the
remaining 2%, or 2 million shares. (Pasch, 1995a.) However, this
plan did not awaken any cooperation from the Ministry of Finance,
nor from those entities to be privatized. Ayau resigned, the
Committee was disbanded and the plan was never implemented ("Ayau
reconsiderará...", 1995.)
The government of Alvaro Arzú was inaugurated in January,
1996. Three months later, the new Minister of Communications,
Transport, and Public Works, Fritz García-Gallont, announced
that GUATEL's monopoly would soon end. This was a bold move.
Traditionally, GUATEL has acted quite independently of the Ministry
of Communications, its parent institution. The Latin
American Telecom Report observed that "the communications
minister Oscar Martínez appears to provide GUATEL with a
substantial amount of leeway over the management of the country's
telecom sector." ("Long Term...", 1993.) In 1994, a scandal broke
when GUATEL's general manager, Guillermo Porras Ovalle, seemed to
be blocking the privatization efforts of then Minister Gorge
Erdmenger (Ruiz Calderón, 1994; Solares Jr., 1994.) With
his announcement, García-Gallont announced his intention to
open up a new era of cooperation between his Ministry and
GUATEL.
García-Gallont also acknowledged certain "anomalies" in
previous business handled by GUATEL. He referred specifically to
the 1995 public offering for cellular phone services, which is
still under investigation (Ajanel Soberanis, 1996a; Morales
Monzón, 1996.) The power wielded by GUATEL's management has
led to illegal moves and corruption. The new manager found that
many existing contracts with GUATEL's providers were overpriced,
and negotiated discounts of up to 25% (Villela, 1996.) Bribes were
often expected by GUATEL's employees and received in exchange for
expediting certain licenses and for granting phone lines: "the
illegal sale of phone lines [is a] vice instituted and executed at
plain sight, abusing the patience of the public" (Vásquez
Araya, 1994). Prensa Libre, the daily with the
highest circulation in the country, remarked that GUATEL is "one of
the most generous mines that serve as a source of illicit
enrichment for government servants" (Pérez, 1994.)
In May 1996, Alfredo Guzmán, a young systems engineer,
was named new general manager of GUATEL. He quickly drew attention
by announcing an ambitious privatization plan. GUATEL will become
a partnership, in which workers own a percentage of the stock.
Initially there will be no private investors. Guzmán
expected that, by March of 1997, the competition in all services
would be open. And this included all services: local
and international voice lines, data networks, and satellite data
communications. A new telecommunications law, the Ley
General de Telecomunicaciones, would create a regulatory
office responsible for overseeing the interconnection of public
networks and the access to network elements, also managing all
frequencies (including television and radio), and allocating other
resources (Ajanel Soberanis, 1996b; "Gobierno anuncia...", "GUATEL
revela..."; Urízar, 1996.) With an eye on the March 1997
deadline, Guzmán started working to restructure GUATEL. His
goal: create an efficient company capable of competing with the
expected new contenders. By mid-1996, over 60% of GUATEL's income
was derived from international calls, which cost two to three times
more than comparable calls from the United States. On the other
hand, local calls were relatively inexpensive, so much so that
GUATEL was "losing" money in this part of its business. Charges
were about US$.66 per month for residential service. This included
600 free minutes of local calls and US$0.0044 per additional minute
(Urízar, p.13.) Because of its price structure, GUATEL
would post monthly losses of Q.20 million (approximately US$3
million) if it lost its revenue from international calls.
The workers' unions posed a difficulty for Guzmán.
According to a survey, 70% of all Guatemalans were in favor of
breaking up GUATEL's monopoly. However, the workers' unions
strongly disagreed. By mid-1996, GUATEL had 7,000 employees, or 57
lines per employee. Carmen Urízar, a researcher with CIEN
(Centro de Investigaciones Económicas
Nacionales, Guatemala) points out that efficient phone
companies tend to have about 250 lines per employee, or five times
less employees than GUATEL (Urízar, 1996).
Both unions, STEGUATEL, Sindicato de Trabajadores de
GUATEL, and the Sindicato 22 de febrero feared
that hundreds of workers would lose their jobs. They also
complained that their proposals for handling the restructuring
process had been ignored (González & Morales, 1996.)
Negotiations can be tense. For example, in December of 1994, the
workers unions announced that they "would take industrial action,
cutting off all domestic and international telephone services" if
the governmental privatisation drive continued ("Union
Resistance...", 1994.) On the other hand, union members have
complained of receiving death threats and suffering attacks
(Hernández, 1996.)
If the process of desmonopolización takes
place as planned, and judging from the level of interest expressed
by foreign and national communications companies, by late 1997
there should be a variety of options open to users, including the
legalization of Telepuerto's operations, VSAT use, a privately
operated fiber optic based frame relay network in Guatemala City,
cable-based connectivity, etc.
3 THE PRE-INTERNET ERA: UUCP, BITNET, AND X.400
The critical shortage of phone lines, the high cost of
international phone calls, the difficulty in accessing PSNs, and
the tight control of all telecommunications services including IBS,
made it difficult for potential users and service providers to
develop and use national networks and made it almost impossible to
connect to international networks. This delayed the adoption of
electronic mail, database searching, and other tools commonly used
in other countries. This situation is similar in other Central
American countries. In this context, it is interesting to see how
various connectivity efforts have fared. Few studies have been
published about the adoption and use of computer networks in
Central America. Statistics about numbers of users and growth are
almost nonexistent. It would be very interesting to study how the
introduction and spread of communication innovations has depended
on a few key individuals, as can be gleaned from the following
description.
nicarao, the first email node in the region,
was born at CRIES (Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones
Económicas y Sociales) in Nicaragua. In 1985, a
small group of CRIES researchers decided to link the affiliated
research centers and NGOs spread throughout Central America and the
Caribbean through a low cost, easy to operate computer network.
The group included Kent Norsworthy, Gustavo Diéguez, Jimi
Campbell Jerez, Alfonso Dubois, and later Alberto Cabezas, a
Chilean with experience in the use of modems and email.
Participants in the project could open accounts with the IGC
(Institute for Global Communication) based in San Francisco,
California. Access to IGC was via dial-up through Costa Rica's
packet switching network. With funding from NORAD (Norwegian
Agency for Development) and the IGC, an email node was created in
1989. This node, nicarao, consisted of a 386
microcomputer with a 9,600 baud modem. In 1988, IGC had become the
central APC node, a network of interconnected uucp nodes.
nicarao became the first Latin American APC node
(Norsworthy, 1996).
Another important effort was the huracan
(hurricane) project, a uucp service managed by Theodore Hope in
Costa Rica and used by about one thousand Central Americans between
September 1990 and mid-1995. Initial funding was provided by the
regional (Latin America/Caribbean) UNDP (United Nations Development
Program) project for non-commercial data communications networks.
Telecommunications costs were at first covered by the Canadian
International Development Agency (ACDI) and later on by usage fees.
huracan.cr was a 386 (8 MB RAM, 650 MB disk)
computer running Interactive Unix and set up as an X.25 host on
Costa Rica's Racsapac. Users connected to huracan by calling
Racsapac or one of its points of access throughout the region.
Connection costs were between US$0.05 and US$0.15 per minute. The
cost of receiving email varied according to the size of each
message, starting at about $.50 for 2 Kbytes.
huracan communicated with the rest of the world
via dial-up calls to uunet, using a Telebit T2500 modem. (Hope,
1992).
A third uucp node was run by Luis Furlán, director of
computing services at the UVG, Universidad Del Valle de
Guatemala. Mr. Furlán first registered the top
Guatemala domain (gt) in August of 1992. With limited funding he
was able to run an email node, uvg.gt, for a small
number of his University's faculty and students. In July 1993,
service was also offered to outside researchers for a monthly
fee.
At one point, there were hopes of interconnecting
uvg, huracan,
copan.hd (Honduras), the node at the UNI
(Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería in
Nicaragua) and possibly other academic/non-profit uucp nodes in
what some referred to as a "Central American UUCP backbone". This
would have served as an integrated, "low-cost option before
obtaining full Internet connectivity" with "alternate connections
in case of technical problems" (Ortega, 1993.) Sharing the cost
of international calls through this "uucp gateway" among all
participants would have lowered the overall costs. However, at the
same time, the Costa Rican Internet projects were gaining strength
and pushing further developments in its direction. Costa Rica is
a regional leader in telecommunications development. By 1996 this
country had the highest phone density in Central America, 14 lines
per 100 inhabitants. RACSA, as mentioned previously, took advantage
of the regional microwave infrastructure to expand their Racsapac
services. And Costa Rica was first in becoming a part of the
global networks. Guy de Teramond, a physicist who had studied in
France, felt the need to communicate with his colleagues through
email. Thanks to his efforts, the UCR (Universidad de Costa
Rica) connected to BITNET in November 1990 (de Teramond,
1992) and to the Internet in January 1993 (de Teramond, 1993.)
BITNET use through the UCRVM2 node was free of
charge for research institutions. Access was possible from the rest
of Central America through the X.28 ports run by RACSA. By
January, 1992, there were about 1,200 registered BITNET users in
the region, of which 75% were at the UCR and the rest were spread
out at over 30 institutions in the region. In Guatemala, by early
1992, only a dozen researchers had BITNET accounts. Among these was
Rafael Flores, Research Coordinator at the INCAP (Instituto
de Nutrición de Centroamérica y
Panamá), who was actively trying to find a way to
connect INCAP to the Internet. At another regional research
institute, the ICAITI (Instituto Centroamericano de
Investigación y Tecnología Industrial), the
librarian, Rocío Marbán, offered Dialog and BRS
searching.
Email services were also being used by commercial organizations.
These tended to be individualized efforts, tailored to each
company's needs and operations. Esso, the EXXON subsidiary in
Guatemala, started using an internal email service in 1987 and by
1992, downloads from the Miami headquarters were done four times a
day via dial-up connections. Sun Microsystems installed a dial-up
link in Guatemala in November 1991, with the purpose of providing
faster technical support for local clients. The system ran on a
SPARC 2 workstation with 1 GB disk storage and a 14.4 Telebit
modem. Downloads occurred twice a day with the California
headquarters, and occasionally with the SUN offices in Costa Rica.
SUN clients could apply for one free account and login as often as
needed, but since there was only one phone line serving the node,
they were asked to limit their usage to 15 minutes at a time. This
node operated for about 4 years.
Alternatives to expensive dial-up uucp systems were provided by
several commercial providers with various degrees of success.
X.400 service was available through MCI Mail (Contactel), Mayamail
(Telemail via GUATEL), SprintMail (Telemail via Mundinet,
Inprosersa), Geonet (Citel), Easylink (AT&T), and Delphi,
Itinet, and Racsamail (Prodata). These providers had the very
difficult task of developing the demand for a service that was
relatively expensive and unknown to the Guatemalan public, while
dealing with GUATEL's Mayapaq and the limitations in the speed and
reliability of service they could offer. By mid-1995, Itinet
(Prodata) claimed about 350 users countrywide (Pasch, 1995b.) In
all, considering the academic uucp users, private businesses
running their own connections, and commercial services, the total
number of email users in Guatemala by early-1995 reached, at most,
1,000.
4 MAYANET: GUATEMALA'S ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH NETWORK
An encouraging sign in terms of funding for a possible academic
network, was the creation of the FONACYT (Fondo Nacional de
Ciencia y Tecnología), the national science and
technology fund, in November 1992. According to the initial
announcement, the fund was to receive Q15 million (about US$2.5
million) from the government every year. The fund would be managed
by the CONCYT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y
Tecnología ("Creado el Fondo...", 1992.) Once this
fund was created, the odds improved for implementing technological
projects in Guatemala.
At that time, the Comisión de Informática
was one of the most active committees inside the CONCYT.
Members included Luis Roberto Baessa (President), Carlos Berges
(USAC, Universidad de San Carlos), Patricia Castillo
(ADIG, Asociación de Informática de
Guatemala), Luis Furlán (UVG, elected President after
Baessas's term), Rocío Marbán (ICAITI), Rafael
Mendía (UFM), Grete Pasch (UFM), Mario Sosa (URL,
Universidad Rafael Landívar), and a
representative from GUATEL. The committee drafted various
proposals to advance the use of computers and communications in
Guatemala, including the creation of an Internet link and a
national academic network.
The first draft of this project, later known as "Mayanet", was
presented to Saul Hahn, director of the OAS RedHUCyt project,
during his visit to Guatemala in February, 1993. Dr. Hahn offered
to support a national network initiative which would become part of
the Central American project, funded to establish "a backbone of
interconnected institutions with an outlet through the Costa Rican
National Research Network" (Hahn, p. 7). This backbone would use
the basic infrastructure provided by the COMTELCA microwave network
to interconnect all Central American countries to the Costa Rica
main node. Given the limitations of the COMTELCA infrastructure,
the Comisión insisted on the need for a
satellite link to serve Guatemala. At that time, the cost for the
uplink at 64 Kbps was quoted by GUATEL at over US$4,500 per month,
plus US$2,000 per month for a downlink in Maryland, United States
with Sprint. Negotiations with GUATEL for lower rates started
then.
Under Luis Furlán, a small group of representatives from
the five Guatemalan universities, two research institutions (ICAITI
and INCAP), and the CONCYT continued working together to push the
Mayanet project forward. In 1995 Magalí Morales, the
CONCYT's National Science & Technology Coordinator, became the
driving force behind the project. In February, 1995 an initial
agreement was signed between the interested parties and the
Guatemalan government. By April 1995, the final contracts between
the participants and GUATEL were signed. GUATEL agreed to cover
the expenses for the leased 2 Mbps lines to each participant, plus
the cost of the shared 64 Kbps uplink. Each participant agreed to
pay US$350 per month for two years to cover the cost of the
downlink in the United States. The OAS donated the central Cisco
7010 router, routers and nameservers for the universities, plus
additional equipment for network expansion.
Mayanet was officially connected to the Internet on December 6,
1995 (Hahn, 1995). The number of users effectively connected then
was low, for various reasons. First, GUATEL explicitly forbid the
use of dial-in access for remote users. In their view, this would
increase the risk of "commercial usage" of what was supposed to be
a purely academic network. Second, participating institutions had
varying degrees of technical knowledge, no administrative
experience in managing Internet resources, and varying degrees of
infrastructure ready to make the most of their connectivity (see
Table 1.) The two universities who were best prepared (UVG and
URL) suffered a two month delay in the installation of their leased
lines, but this did not seem to affect the spread of Internet use
on their campus.
Table 1 Internet-related infrastructure of
MayaNet participants
ICAITI, Instituto Centroamericano de Investigación y Tecnología Industrial: www.icaiti.org.gt.
Mid-1995: UNIX and Novell network. October 1996: Alpha running NT + 15 PCs, Coax and UTP Ethernet. One line for dial-inINCAP, Instituto de Nutrición de Centroamérica y Panamá: www.incap.org.gt
95: Network with over 100 workstations. October 96: Novell network, Alpha + one linux server, 85 stations, UTP Ethernet.UFM, Universidad Francisco Marroquín: www.ufm.edu.gt
Mid-1995: no campus wide network. October, 1996: UTP in central building, Sun server, 25 PCs ready to be connected.UMG, Universidad Mariano Gálvez: www.umg.edu.gt
October, 1996: HPUX server, Novell, 8 PCs, Coax Ethernet.URL, Universidad Rafael Landívar: www.url.edu.gt
Campus-wide FDDI fiber optic network in place since 1994 (Pasch, 1994b.) By mid-1995: NT network servers (486/66 Mhz Pentiums) installed in several buildings, various computer labs with over 100 networked PCs, Novell. By October 1996: about 200 accounts opened, 300 networked PCs (60 connected to the Internet), one phone line for external dial-in access, one for internal dial-in. Distributed Internet access expected for November, 1996.USAC, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala: www.usac.edu.gt
October, 1996: Novell network, one Alpha server, 50 PCs; fiber optic network, 10 Fl, UTP and coax Ethernet. Internal network pending. Two lines for dial-in access.UVG, Universidad Del Valle de Guatemala: www.uvg.edu.gt
Mid-1995: uvg.gt uucp node. Early 1996: new uucp node, uvalle.gt for outside users; uvg.edu.gt on Internet. October, 1996: NT, HPUX and Sun (25 stations total); Novell network (38 stations), Lantastic network (50 stations, for local American School), UTP Ethernet (103 machines). Fiber Optic network, 10 Fl. Four lines for dial-in access.
Of these institutions, the UVG had the fastest growth in the
number of active users, probably a result of the individual efforts
of Luis Furlán and the technical savvy of Frankie
Arzú, a young computer science professor and enthusiastic
Internet user.
Although exact numbers are not available, the directory of
Guatemalans on the network, Chapines Online
(www.nortropic.com/chapines/), contains a good sample of users both
in Guatemala and abroad. Table 2 was extracted from the user
records in October 1996. In some cases, one account can be shared
by many users. For example, all library personnel at the ICAITI
share one account, biblio@icaiti.org. Many university
students opened commercial accounts instead of waiting for their
institutions to provide one for them. For example, 35 UFM students
who registered with Chapines Online had opened
accounts with a commercial provider by October 1996.
br>
Table 2. MayaNet users registered with Chapines Online Institution Users ----------- ----- UFM None URL 13 UMG 1 USAC 1 UVG 70 INCAP 2 ICAITI 12 CONCYT 8Source: Chapines Online. October 1, 1996.
5 COMMERCIAL INTERNET SERVICES
Commercial services grew much faster. Cybernet de Guatemala
(guate.net) was the first company to offer
commercial Internet access in Guatemala. Although they had a
working connection by early 1995, the official announcement of
their services was delayed until November 6. The initial monthly
rates were US$60 for an email account with 40 hours of SLIP access.
An unlimited access rate of US$66 per month was announced in
April.
Cybernet's permit to operate as an ISP followed the guidelines
established by the previous general manager of GUATEL, Gustavo
Adolfo Díaz López. However, these guidelines offered
two problems for other potential ISPs. First, every ISP was forced
to transfer to GUATEL 10% of all Internet related sales, including
services, Internet seminars, and even "revenue derived from the use
of GUATEL's logo", plus 15% of related sales of software, and 4% of
modem sales (Ayau, 1995b.) And, most importantly, to qualify for
the approval process, potential ISPs had to fulfill a long list of
technical and administrative requirements that seemed made to fit
Cybernet and few, if any, other companies (Jacobs, 1996b.)
An ISP association, the Gremial de Proveedores de
Servicios de Internet (GPSI), was formed and registered as
a member of the Guatemalan Chamber of Commerce. The GPSI helped
exert pressure on GUATEL to revoke the exclusive contract with
Cybernet. Several members of the Mayanet project also spoke out.
In April, GUATEL published a new set of rules for ISPs, including
a provision that revoked all contracts granted previously
("GUATEL: Acuerdo Número 04-96", Article 19.)
In the words of Alfredo Guzmán: "What we wish to accomplish
here is that instead of having only one company providing Internet
services, many providers can have access" (Canteo, 1996.)
From then on, ISPs were required to register with GUATEL, and to
use only GUATEL's earth station to connect to the Internet. By
mid-1996, GUATEL was operating one 512 Kbps link to Teleglobe in
Canada, and a 512 Kbps link with MCI to Virginia. A T1 link to the
UNAM (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México) was in the planning stages (Giordano, 1996.)
The monthly fees for connectivity were set in detail by the new
guidelines: US$3,250 for 64 Kbps, US$5,850 for 128 Kbps, US$6,700
for 256 Kbps, and US$13,600 for 512 Kbps. GUATEL also receives 2%
over all Internet related sales from each ISP. 1% of this pays for
the expenses of regulating the services, and 1% is destined for
rural and educational Internet projects.
The new law explicitly warns against "causing damage to the
State or to third parties while using the service". It also forbids
using Internet phone and videoconferencing applications. It was
not stated how these infractions would be monitored and punished,
but several users of the Guatemalan mailing list, chapin-
l, were afraid that these measures would lead to
increasing government control. In this and other online discussion
fora, some remembered the tight control over information exercised
by previous regimes, and others made references to the opressive
situation in China (Canteo, 1996.)
By mid-May, GuateRed, the Internet registry, was opened and 12
companies were interested in providing Internet services. During
the month of June, the number of users grew very quickly. By
September, Chapines Online listed over 900 users
holding accounts with ISPs in Guatemala. The breakdown was as
follows:
Table 3. Users on commercial ISPs registered with Chapines Online ISP Users -------------------------- ----- guate.net (Cybernet) 537 infovia.com (Infovia) 134 tikal.net (TikalRed) 51 gua.net (Instared) 47 quetzal.net (Tecnisoft) 43 pronet.gt (Prodata) 33 c.net.gt (Inprosersa) 28 gbm.net.gt (GBMNet/IBM) 26 guatenet.net.gt (Kepsa) 22 geocities.com 10 hotmail.com 11Source: Pasch, 1996.
Note that at least 21 Guatemalans had already found the free email services of Hotmail and Geocities. Of those registered, 35 had built a homepage on Geocities, and many participated regularly in the Guatemala Online "Powwow" Forum, the Guatemala IRC channel, and other Web chat pages. Our best estimate of total number of Internet users is as follows:
Table 4. Estimated number of Internet users in Guatemala Month (96) Est. Internet users, Guatemala ----------- ------------------- March Between 500 and 800 May 1,000 - 1,300 June 2,000 July 2,500 October 3,500 December est. Between 6,000 and 10,000Sources: Gorge Figueroa, general manager, Cybernet (presentation, March 1996). Juan Manuel Giordano, director, GPSI (personal communication, September 1996). Mario Sosa, URL (personal communication, October 1996). Velásquez de Estrada, 1996.
6 USERS AND USE
More important than the number of users is how the Internet is being used in Guatemala. The advantages of electronic mail and surfing the Web have to be experienced to be understood. For example, in 1993, we emailed an order for Tracy LaQuey's "The Internet Companion" through the Software Tool & Die (obs@world.std.com) from a PC, bypassing the slow and unpredictable Guatemalan post office service. Then, during the 1993 coup d'etat, when the media was forcefully silenced, we shared news reports received via email and through the huracan newsgroups with faculty and students at our University. It is important that policymakers and officials get acquainted with the technology at this, very personal level, otherwise the importance of the medium is only paid lip service to, but never really understood (nor backed) by them. Fortunately, Guatemalans in all walks of life are beginning to explore the Internet:
7 SUGGESTIONS FOR RELATED RESEARCH
Research efforts need to concentrate on the collection of relevant
statistics and user studies. Studies could also make use of the
newness of Internet in Guatemala. Rogers (1983) suggests that
looking at "inter-connectedness", i.e., the degree to which "the
units in a social system are linked by interpersonal networks", is
a useful way of measuring innovativeness in organizations. Studying
the interaction of Internet users in Guatemala, where the
technology is just being introduced, could provide clues as to how
these personal networks grow. Studies could also focus on
"innovation leaders", their characteristics, and their position in
interpersonal networks both inside and outside of their
organizations.
Finally, research has shown that the early adopters do not
necessarily have to be cosmopolitan, specialized, and of the
highest social status. Cancian (1967) found that those who have
the most to gain tend to adopt risky innovations first. There is
also some evidence that computers and communications systems are
being used by disadvantaged citizens, notably those who are being
"politically oppressed" and who have contacts with foreign
grassroots organizations (Annis, 1991.) In Guatemala, more
research on the adoption of the Internet should be carried out from
this perspective.
8 REFERENCES
Ajanel Soberanis, Carlos (1996a, July 19) Gobierno diseña nueva estrategia para adjudicación de telefonía celular. Prensa Libre (Guatemala), 77.
Ajanel Soberanis, Carlos (1996b, August 22) Ejecutivo presentará iniciativa de ley para convertir a GUATEL en Sociedad Anónima. Prensa Libre (Guatemala), 92.
Annis, Sheldon (1991, Fall) Giving voice to the poor. Foreign Policy 84, 93-106.
Ayau Cordón, Manuel F. (1995a, April 6) La privatización: novedosa idea? Prensa Libre (Guatemala), 12.
Ayau Cordón, Manuel F. (1995b, December) El Colmo! Prensa Libre (Guatemala).
Ayau reconsiderará renuncia si se acelera proceso de privatización (1995, February 23) Prensa Libre (Guatemala), 104.
Cancian, Frank (1967) Stratification and risk-taking: a theory tested on agricultural innovation. American Sociological Review, 32, 912-926.
Canteo, Carlos (1996, May 14) GUATEL: Monopolio en Internet seguirá hasta el próximo año. Siglo XXI (Guatemala), 3.
Chang, Connie (1994, August) Más que las telecomunicaciones. Gerencia-Suplemento Informática (Guatemala), 4, 6-7.
CC [Corte de Constitucionalidad] declaró sin lugar ocurso contra GUATEL (1993, May 1) Prensa Libre (Guatemala).
Contreras, Alejandro (1992) Sistemas de mensajería electrónica y su acceso a través de la red pública de datos de Guatemala. Universidad Del Valle de Guatemala, Thesis (BSc, Electronic Engineering)
Creado el Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (1992, November 19) Siglo XXI (Guatemala), 4.
de Teramond, Guy (1992) Description of the Research Network Initiative in Costa Rica. UCR, Working Paper, Costa Rica.
de Teramond, Guy (gdeter@inforisc.cr) (1993, February 4)
Comunicado de prensa: Costa Rica se interconecta a Internet. Available at: http://www.nortropic.com/internet/cr/gdet930204.html
Duke, Roberto (1995, April) Private Communication.
Gobierno anuncia desmonopolizacion de telefonía (1996, April 27) La Nación (Costa Rica) [World Wide Web] Available at http://www.nacion.co.cr/CentroAmerica/Archivo/1996/abril/27/guatemala.html
Gobierno aprueba interconexión por computadoras (1995, February 17) La República (Guatemala), 12.
González, A.L. and C. Morales (1996, May 24) GUATEL se convertirá en una sociedad anónima. Crónica (Guatemala), 39.
GUATEL revela ambicioso plan de desmonopolización (1996, May 17) Siglo XXI.
GUATEL: Acuerdo Número 04-96. (1996, April 12) Diario de Centroamérica (Guatemala), 2054-2055.
Hahn, Saul (1994, July) Computer Networking in Latin America and the Caribbean: the OAS Hemisphere-Wide Inter-University Scientific and Technological Information Network (RedHUCyT). Paper presented at the 45 International Council of Americanists. Stockholm, Sweden.
Hahn, Saul (shahn@hamlet.umd.edu) (1995, December 6)
Guatemala en Internet! [Email] Available at: http://www.nortropic.com/internet/gt/hahn951206.html
Hernández S., Ramón (1996, September 10) Sindicalista está bajo protección de MINUGUA tras sufrir segundo atentado
Prensa Libre (Guatemala), 14. Hope, Theodore (1992, March 1) Private Communication.
Hurtarte Gordillo, Francisco Javier (1993, May 4) Se inicia privatización de activos estatales. Prensa Libre (Guatemala), 66.
Ibargüen S., Giancarlo (1992) Privatizar las ondas de radio, in La Privatización: una oportunidad! (ed. by Juan F. Bendfeldt and Hugo Maúl), CEES, Guatemala. 231-234.
Internet leads to arrest of U.S. fugitive (1996, May 19)
Reuters [Usenet] Newsgroup: clari.world.americas.central, Message ID: PXRfugitiveVR9FA_6yJ@clari.net
Jacobs, Jorge (1993, April 29) No más monopolios de GUATEL! Siglo XXI (Guatemala), 10.
Jacobs, Jorge (1996a, July 17) Un pequeño paso para el tránsito, un gran paso para la Ley. Prensa Libre (Guatemala), editorial page.
Jacobs, Jorge (1996b, August) Internet comercial en Guatemala. Gerencia (Guatemala), 34, 36.
Long term prospects in Guatemala (1993, December 1) Latin American Telecom Report [Online], 12. Available: Lexis-Nexis.
Morales Monzón, Carlos (1995, September 29) Hubo mano de mono. Crónica (Guatemala) VIII, 395, 19-27.
Norsworthy, Kent (1996, August) Private Communication.
Ortega, Teresa (1993, August) Propuesta Backbone uucp Centroamericano. Paper presented at the Seminario Centroamericano para Especialistas en Información, Guatemala.
Pasch, Grete (1994a, August) El Futuro es ahora. Gerencia- Suplemento Informática (Guatemala), 8-9, 12. Available at http://www.nortropic.com/internet/gt/pasc9408a.html
Pasch, Grete (1994b, August) Para servir 1,000 puntos de luz Gerencia-Suplemento Informática (Guatemala), 13-15. Available at http://www.nortropic.com/internet/gt/pasc9408b.html
Pasch, Grete (1995a, May) Telecomunicaciones en Guatemala. Gerencia (Guatemala), 11-17. Available at http://www.nortropic.com/internet/gt/pasc9505.html
Pasch, Grete (1995b, August) Internet para Guatemala: cuándo y porqué Gerencia En Directo (Guatemala), 1-9. Available at http://www.nortropic.com/internet/gt/pasc9508.html
Pasch, Grete (1996) Chapines Online: Estadísticas [World Wide Web]. Available at http://www.nortropic.com/chapines/stats/
Pérez, Luis Enrique (1994, January 18) GUATEL, serranismo y Ministerio Público. Prensa Libre, 10.
Rivera, Eileen (1996, July 14) Internet: la supercarretera de la información. Suplemento Domingo (Prensa Libre, Guatemala), 11-13.
Rogers, Everett M. (1983) Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New York.
Ruiz Calderón, Juan Carlos (1994, July 17) Setenta y dos empresas interesadas en invertir en telecomunicaciones. Siglo XXI (Guatemala), 4.
Solares, Jr. (1994, July 23) GUATEL no es como la pintan. Prensa Libre (Guatemala), 12.
Telecomunicaciones (1996, August 30) Prensa Libre (Guatemala), 2. Union resistance to plans to sell off telephone company (1994, December 8) Latin America Weekly Report [Online], WR-94-47, 555. Available: Lexis-Nexis.
Urízar, Carmen (1996, September) Cómo salir a flote en el país de los monopolios. Telecomunicaciones, la reforma que podría hacer historia. Anexo: Entrevista con Alfredo Guzmán. Gerencia (Guatemala), 12-16.
Vásquez Araya, Carolina (1994, July 20) Guillermo Porras Ovalle: GUATEL no necesita una administración política, sino una buena administración. Prensa Libre (Guatemala), 8.
Velásquez de Estrada, Doménica (1996, May 28) Más de 6mil usuarios tendrán acceso a INTERNET a fines de 1996. Prensa Libre, 64.
Villela, Isabel (1996, September 1) La Conversación: Alfredo Guzmán. Magazine 21 (Siglo XXI, Guatemala), 7.
9 ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Grete Pasch works as a consultant in information systems, and is currently a PhD Candidate in the Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Texas at Austin. Her research focuses on the creation of dynamic Internet resource directories. Carmen Valdés is an independent consultant specializing in the analysis of Guatemalan media.